Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 50

Thread: Letter to the editor: Shame on Those Who Dismiss Allegations Against Lotief.

  1. #21
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    110

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ULvictory View Post
    Leave it up to some the coullions commenting on the article on Facebook claiming that the co-worker was just disgruntled.

    These people have no shame.
    It's no different than people who shame rape victims. It's disgusting that these Lotief supporters will go to this level against people who were put in a difficult work environment.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    1,201

    Default Re: Letter to the editor: Shame on Those Who Dismiss Allegations Against Lotief.

    Because they don't see anything else outside of softball wins. That's how dense some of these people are.


  3. #23
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Lafayette LA
    Posts
    7,988

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by whataburger View Post
    Are we going to laud the hometown rag now for publishing Jesse's response to the cultist who penned the previously published letter to the editor? Just asking.
    They only published it because I made a public spectacle of their coverage first, and challenged them to be fair and publish the letter I was about to write. They almost had no choice.

    The coverage has stayed far from neutral. As far as I can tell, my letter is the only fair coverage this entire issue has gotten in the DA.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    3,125
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Letter to the editor: Shame on Those Who Dismiss Allegations Against Lotief.

    I do not agree with the way Lotief spoke to and treated some Cajun softball players. The accusations are alarming and the university had no choice but to fire him.

    HOWEVER, the argument at the base of this letter is flawed. The whole point of this letter is that the way Lotief treated his players is not acceptable in a professional Work environment.

    Wellllll, NO ____!

    BasinBear, you have been outspoken about this. While coaching, did you ever talk to a player in a manner that would not be acceptable by HR in your post coaching career? Not trying to call you out it's just a fact on this board that you were once a coach. So did you ever raise your voice or say something that would not be acceptable in an office setting?

    You think the way Hud and Coaches (or any other NCAA football coach and most baseball and softball coaches) would fly with the HR team at my office?!?! I would bet a paycheck that some things are said at practice that would call for "immediate termination" by the local HR guy at 90% of businesses.

    Comparing the way NCAA coaches speak to and treat their players to how a professional is expected to treat their co-workers is pretty silly.

    If we want NCAA coaches to begin treating their players with the respect required in a professional setting then that's fine.....but to think that it is the current normal throughout college athletics today is being naive.

    This post is in no way defending Lotief's actions but pointing out the flaws in the argument trying to be made by writer.


  5. #25
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Lafayette
    Posts
    879

    Default Re: Letter to the editor: Shame on Those Who Dismiss Allegations Against Lotief.

    Quote Originally Posted by axg8750 View Post
    I do not agree with the way Lotief spoke to and treated some Cajun softball players. The accusations are alarming and the university had no choice but to fire him.

    HOWEVER, the argument at the base of this letter is flawed. The whole point of this letter is that the way Lotief treated his players is not acceptable in a professional Work environment.

    Wellllll, NO ____!

    BasinBear, you have been outspoken about this. While coaching, did you ever talk to a player in a manner that would not be acceptable by HR in your post coaching career? Not trying to call you out it's just a fact on this board that you were once a coach. So did you ever raise your voice or say something that would not be acceptable in an office setting?

    You think the way Hud and Coaches (or any other NCAA football coach and most baseball and softball coaches) would fly with the HR team at my office?!?! I would bet a paycheck that some things are said at practice that would call for "immediate termination" by the local HR guy at 90% of businesses.

    Comparing the way NCAA coaches speak to and treat their players to how a professional is expected to treat their co-workers is pretty silly.

    If we want NCAA coaches to begin treating their players with the respect required in a professional setting then that's fine.....but to think that it is the current normal throughout college athletics today is being naive.

    This post is in no way defending Lotief's actions but pointing out the flaws in the argument trying to be made by writer.
    That's a good point....BUT....you're leaving out one VERY important caveat—football coaches coach BOYS/MEN, and Lotief coaches WOMEN!! GASP—I said it!! It may be 2017, but their is STILL a DIFFERENCE in calling a football lineman a p____, and saying that to a female softball player; or for that matter, using language at work on a female coworker as opposed to a male.....
    It's one thing if you're a drill Sargent in the military—women going through boot camp know what they're signing up for, but playing college sports?? Just sayin.....

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    1,954

    Default Re: Letter to the editor: Shame on Those Who Dismiss Allegations Against Lotief.

    Quote Originally Posted by axg8750 View Post
    I do not agree with the way Lotief spoke to and treated some Cajun softball players. The accusations are alarming and the university had no choice but to fire him.

    HOWEVER, the argument at the base of this letter is flawed. The whole point of this letter is that the way Lotief treated his players is not acceptable in a professional Work environment.

    Wellllll, NO ____!

    BasinBear, you have been outspoken about this. While coaching, did you ever talk to a player in a manner that would not be acceptable by HR in your post coaching career? Not trying to call you out it's just a fact on this board that you were once a coach. So did you ever raise your voice or say something that would not be acceptable in an office setting?

    You think the way Hud and Coaches (or any other NCAA football coach and most baseball and softball coaches) would fly with the HR team at my office?!?! I would bet a paycheck that some things are said at practice that would call for "immediate termination" by the local HR guy at 90% of businesses.

    Comparing the way NCAA coaches speak to and treat their players to how a professional is expected to treat their co-workers is pretty silly.

    If we want NCAA coaches to begin treating their players with the respect required in a professional setting then that's fine.....but to think that it is the current normal throughout college athletics today is being naive.

    This post is in no way defending Lotief's actions but pointing out the flaws in the argument trying to be made by writer.
    Take the players out of it. What he did to the strength coach was grounds for termination by itself.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Paradise
    Posts
    12,929

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by axg8750 View Post
    I do not agree with the way Lotief spoke to and treated some Cajun softball players. The accusations are alarming and the university had no choice but to fire him.

    HOWEVER, the argument at the base of this letter is flawed. The whole point of this letter is that the way Lotief treated his players is not acceptable in a professional Work environment.

    Wellllll, NO ____!

    BasinBear, you have been outspoken about this. While coaching, did you ever talk to a player in a manner that would not be acceptable by HR in your post coaching career? Not trying to call you out it's just a fact on this board that you were once a coach. So did you ever raise your voice or say something that would not be acceptable in an office setting?

    You think the way Hud and Coaches (or any other NCAA football coach and most baseball and softball coaches) would fly with the HR team at my office?!?! I would bet a paycheck that some things are said at practice that would call for "immediate termination" by the local HR guy at 90% of businesses.

    Comparing the way NCAA coaches speak to and treat their players to how a professional is expected to treat their co-workers is pretty silly.

    If we want NCAA coaches to begin treating their players with the respect required in a professional setting then that's fine.....but to think that it is the current normal throughout college athletics today is being naive.

    This post is in no way defending Lotief's actions but pointing out the flaws in the argument trying to be made by writer.
    Of course... smh

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Louisiana A
    Posts
    17,901
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default Re: Letter to the editor: Shame on Those Who Dismiss Allegations Against Lotief.

    Quote Originally Posted by KajunKrazy View Post
    Take the players out of it. What he did to the strength coach was grounds for termination by itself.
    He is fortunate he didn't get anything broken, she could make mincemeat out of a large percentage of men on this planet.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    1,737
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by axg8750 View Post
    I do not agree with the way Lotief spoke to and treated some Cajun softball players. The accusations are alarming and the university had no choice but to fire him.

    HOWEVER, the argument at the base of this letter is flawed. The whole point of this letter is that the way Lotief treated his players is not acceptable in a professional Work environment.

    Wellllll, NO ____!

    BasinBear, you have been outspoken about this. While coaching, did you ever talk to a player in a manner that would not be acceptable by HR in your post coaching career? Not trying to call you out it's just a fact on this board that you were once a coach. So did you ever raise your voice or say something that would not be acceptable in an office setting?

    You think the way Hud and Coaches (or any other NCAA football coach and most baseball and softball coaches) would fly with the HR team at my office?!?! I would bet a paycheck that some things are said at practice that would call for "immediate termination" by the local HR guy at 90% of businesses.

    Comparing the way NCAA coaches speak to and treat their players to how a professional is expected to treat their co-workers is pretty silly.

    If we want NCAA coaches to begin treating their players with the respect required in a professional setting then that's fine.....but to think that it is the current normal throughout college athletics today is being naive.

    This post is in no way defending Lotief's actions but pointing out the flaws in the argument trying to be made by writer.
    agree 100%.......80% of all coaches in America would be fired if all of their players were brought in and aggressively interrogated about every single action they have witnessed during practice and games.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    110

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by alum81 View Post
    agree 100%.......80% of all coaches in America would be fired if all of their players were brought in and aggressively interrogated about every single action they have witnessed during practice and games.
    So if the majority do it, does it still make it right?

  11. #31
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Louisiana A
    Posts
    17,901
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default Re: Letter to the editor: Shame on Those Who Dismiss Allegations Against Lotief.

    Quote Originally Posted by GeauxLouisiana View Post
    So if the majority do it, does it still make it right?
    So is this a precedent making case and a taste of #MeToo athletics to come?

  12. #32
    cajun4life's Avatar
    cajun4life is offline Ragin Cajuns of Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns Greatest Fan Ever
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    6,208

    Default Re: Letter to the editor: Shame on Those Who Dismiss Allegations Against Lotief.

    You guys do realize that he wasn't fired for his handling of players right? There were complaints filed and pretty much ignored by the university. I don't agree with calling those players _______. But there are two other common terms that really cross the line when referencing that body part and another person. Lotief was first suspended for verbally threatening Scott Farmer in T-Joe's presence. He resigned, as a result and was later convinced to return as HC. So it wasn't about the language.

    He put hands on another athletic department employee in a demeaning or threatening manner supposedly on video and definitely with witnesses present. That is what got him fired.

    The rest of the stuff brought out by Lotief and his supporters are just fluff and a way to divert attention from the real issue. He was fired with cause due to overt acts of physical intimidation and violence.


  13. #33
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    110

    Default Re: Letter to the editor: Shame on Those Who Dismiss Allegations Against Lotief.

    Aaaaaaaannnnnndddddd people still can't understand it was a CO-WORKER he berated and pushed..... people, it was NOT a player!!!


  14. #34
    Just1More's Avatar
    Just1More is offline Ragin Cajuns of Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns Greatest Fan Ever
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Baton Rouge
    Posts
    15,123
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Letter to the editor: Shame on Those Who Dismiss Allegations Against Lotief.

    Quote Originally Posted by alum81 View Post
    agree 100%.......80% of all coaches in America would be fired if all of their players were brought in and aggressively interrogated about every single action they have witnessed during practice and games.
    You are bound and determined not to understand this situation. First, the "professional work environment" pertains predominantly to his behavior toward another employee. Second, there is no way you can compare the Neanderthal behavior that the world has come to tolerate from the majority of coaches (who are required to act like asses because they lack other skills) that coach young men... with a grown man... a lawyer to boot... that uses gutter language laced with tough talk... with young women. It isn't a comparable situation.

    The fact of the matter is... Coach Lotief would likely have gotten his ___ kicked if he weren't a frail male. I wonder how many of our softball athletes were exposed to this kind of behavior in high school? Are we to believe this is common practice at other top college programs? Most of our softball athletes haven't been to any collegiate program but ours. They actually believe there's a link between them being a top softball program... and having a coach that uses abusive language.

    Lotief is a man that should be apologizing profusely for his behavior while he reflects on how his skills as a coach could have succeeded without it. Instead, we have fans that refuse to separate their appreciation for his softball coaching skills and his abusive behavior.

  15. #35
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    1,737
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Just1More View Post
    You are bound and determined not to understand this situation. First, the "professional work environment" pertains predominantly to his behavior toward another employee. Second, there is no way you can compare the Neanderthal behavior that the world has come to tolerate from the majority of coaches (who are required to act like asses because they lack other skills) that coach young men... with a grown man... a lawyer to boot... that uses gutter language laced with tough talk... with young women. It isn't a comparable situation.

    The fact of the matter is... Coach Lotief would likely have gotten his ___ kicked if he weren't a frail male. I wonder how many of our softball athletes were exposed to this kind of behavior in high school? Are we to believe this is common practice at other top college programs? Most of our softball athletes haven't been to any collegiate program but ours. They actually believe there's a link between them being a top softball program... and having a coach that uses abusive language.

    Lotief is a man that should be apologizing profusely for his behavior while he reflects on how his skills as a coach could have succeeded without it. Instead, we have fans that refuse to separate their appreciation for his softball coaching skills and his abusive behavior.
    It sounds like you are saying, if a coach of a male team was faced with the exact same allegations he would not have been fired.

  16. #36
    cajun4life's Avatar
    cajun4life is offline Ragin Cajuns of Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns Greatest Fan Ever
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    6,208

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by alum81 View Post
    It sounds like you are saying, if a coach of a male team was faced with the exact same allegations he would not have been fired.
    He wasn't fired for language! Geez! The dude was fired for physical intimidation and verbal threats to another UL employee. His 2nd offense by the way.

    His language and treatment of players have been overlooked for what 12 years? That's not what got him fired.

  17. #37
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Paradise
    Posts
    12,929

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GeauxLouisiana View Post
    So if the majority do it, does it still make it right?
    Ignore him. He's a cultist too.

  18. #38
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Paradise
    Posts
    12,929

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunJeaux View Post
    Aaaaaaaannnnnndddddd people still can't understand it was a CO-WORKER he berated and pushed..... people, it was NOT a player!!!
    Couldn't convince Jim Jones followers, and we won't convince this group.

  19. #39
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    337
    Posts
    4,264

    Default Re: Letter to the editor: Shame on Those Who Dismiss Allegations Against Lotief.

    Quote Originally Posted by KajunKrazy View Post
    Take the players out of it. What he did to the strength coach was grounds for termination by itself.
    ^^^^ This^^^^

  20. #40
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Louisiana A
    Posts
    17,901
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default Re: Letter to the editor: Shame on Those Who Dismiss Allegations Against Lotief.

    Quote Originally Posted by KajunKrazy View Post
    Take the players out of it. What he did to the strength coach was grounds for termination by itself.
    That is exactly what the administration should have done. It would have been enough.

    Muddied waters dilute the focus.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •