The SunBelt is perceived as a 1 team conference for March Madness. There is a huge onus for the SunBelt to get this perception off their back.

Perhaps I should have asked what would be better for the SubBelt Conference LONG TERM? However I will stick with "What would be better for the Cajuns LONG TERM," because if it is good for the Conference it will be good for the Cajuns.

Two scenarios:

• Louisiana wins out the regular season, and cruises though the SunBelt tournament-WIN IT-and get an automatic bid.
  
• Louisiana wins out the regular season, and cruises though the SunBelt tournament-LOSE TITLE GAME-and get an at large bid. Sunbelt gets two teams in the big dance.

Under scenario one, SunBelt gets only one team in the big dance.

Under scenario two, SunBelt gets two teams in the big dance.

My question is, What would be better for the Cajuns LONG TERM?

I don't know if it is best for the Cajuns it is best for the SunBelt too get more than one team playing on the ides of March.

Only because of long term

ALL THE WAY TO THE NCAA CHAMPIONSHIP!!!!

Actually, I think that, while I believe we still have a shot at an at-large bid, I believe that we could get a much better seeding and location if we run the table all the way through the Conference Tournament. Unfortunately, that would almost certainly mean that we'd be the only ones getting in.

The reason the Sun Belt is a one team conference has very little to do with the past season. It has to do with this season every season. If we pull a few more major upsets then the whole conference RPI has a dramatic rise. No, no, no I can never see a way that losing is ever bettter than winning.

I think we need to win the Sun Belt tournament. We've got to get into the NCAA tournament. Hoping for an at large bid is too risky, IMHO. For the Cajuns, long term, it's better to get the sure bid for March Madness. No doubt in my mind.

For the Sun Belt, the second scenario may be better, but I am focused on the Cajuns right now. If we can evolve into a team that is bankable EVERY season, that would be the best for us and the conference. The way to do that is to BE SEEN in the tournament and use our repeated berths in the tourney as a recruiting tool.

Just my .02

Quote:

Originally posted by CajunKate I think we need to win the Sun Belt tournament. We've got to get into the NCAA tournament. Hoping for an at large bid is too risky, IMHO. For the Cajuns, long term, it's better to get the sure bid for March Madness. No doubt in my mind. For the Sun Belt, the second scenario may be better, but I am focused on the Cajuns right now. If we can evolve into a team that is bankable EVERY season, that would be the best for us and the conference. The way to do that is to BE SEEN in the tournament and use our repeated berths in the tourney as a recruiting tool. Just my .02

I'll throw in two cents for that one!!!

CajunKate's logic is almost impeccable, though being in a coference that gets two every year would reap the best long term rewards. CajunKate's logic is impeccable for this year.

We've got to win it all in a big way to get a decent seeding in the NCAA's. An at large bid will have us playing Kentucky or Duke. I don't mind playing teams like this.......but not in the first round!!!

Quote:

Originally posted by RedBug58 We've got to win it all in a big way to get a decent seeding in the NCAA's. An at large bid will have us playing Kentucky or Duke. I don't mind playing teams like this.......but not in the first round!!!

Don' you think there is a stigma that is associated with an automatic bid? As far as I recall the NCAA ranks at large bids higher, and automatic bids lower. Don't mistake my meaning, I will take either entry to "Marchness"